Multitafsir UU ITE Sebagai Koridor Hukum: Studi Pada Intensitas User Conflicts di Media Sosial
Original Full-Text Article
Download published version for reading and archivingAbstract
This study aims to examine the impact of multiple interpretations of articles in the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (ITE Law) on the intensity of conflicts between social media users. This study is motivated by the rise of legal cases that arise due to subjective interpretations of Article 27 paragraph (3) and Article 28 paragraph (2), which often lead to the criminalization of legitimate expression in the digital space. Using a qualitative method with a case study approach, data was collected through observation and documentation of digital conflict cases. The results of the study show that the multiple interpretations of these articles not only interfere with legal certainty, but also worsen the psychological condition of users and create inequality in law enforcement. This study also found that low digital literacy and the use of articles as a tool of repression also strengthen the escalation of conflicts on social media. Therefore, a participatory and contextual revision of the ITE Law is needed to ensure fair legal protection, while maintaining freedom of expression in the digital era. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of establishing a digital legal corridor that is adaptive, inclusive, and in harmony with the communication dynamics of modern society in order to create a healthy, safe, and democratic public space.
Keywords:
Author Biographies
Program Studi Doktor Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Kabupaten Deli Serdang, Provinsi Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.
Program Studi Doktor Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Kabupaten Deli Serdang, Provinsi Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.
How to Cite
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .
- Share: You are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
- Adapt: You are free to remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
References
Total: 35 References- Andih, S. (2019). Pengaturan bukti petunjuk pada hukum acara persaingan usaha dalam kerangka hukum pembuktian di Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 8(4), 575. https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2019.v08.i04.p10.
- Arafat, M., & Wirasto, A. (2024). Kebijakan kriminal dalam penanganan siber di era digital: Studi kasus di Indonesia. Equality: Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 1(2), 220–241. https://doi.org/10.69836/equality-jlj.v1i2.170.
- Azis, A. (2016). Tindak pidana penyebaran informasi yang menimbulkan rasa kebencian atau permusuhan melalui internet di Indonesia. Pakuan Law Review, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v2i2.940.
- Barth, V., Zeng, J., Vvedenskaya, I., Ouyang, M., Husson, R., & Woychik, N. (2019). Toxin-mediated ribosome stalling reprograms the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteome. Nature Communications, 10(1), 3035. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10869-8.
- Cahyadi, H., et al. (2021). Hubungan antara kebijakan UU ITE dengan keinginan mahasiswa dalam mengkritik pemerintah di media sosial. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 5(2), 660–670. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v5i2.1962.
Similar Articles
Articles sharing related keywords and machine learning classifications:
Most read articles by the same author(s)
Other papers published by author(s) in this journal: