Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024) • Articles
Open Access

Komunikasi Interpersonal Dosen dan Mahasiswa Perguruan Tinggi Vokasi di Jurusan Teknik Mesin Politeknik Negeri Malang

Muhammad Adil Amrullah
Universitas Brawijay
Rachmat Kriyantono
Universitas Brawijaya
Yuyun Agus Riani
Universitas Brawijaya
Published: September 20, 2024 Pages: 2496-2509
Original Full-Text Article
Download published version for reading and archiving
Abstract

This article analyzes the strategies and models of interpersonal communication of lecturers to students at vocational colleges of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Malang State Polytechnic. The results of the study show that interpersonal communication strategies are carried out with dididic and triadic models. Meanwhile, the interpersonal communication model of lecturers and students uses an interactive model, where there is interdependence and active participation between lecturers and students. Communication anxiety, both chronic (trait apprehension) and situational (state apprehension), can be an obstacle in the interaction between lecturers and students, affecting participation, presentation quality, and students' ability to convey ideas clearly and confidently.

Article Metrics & Downloads Graph
Monthly Download Trends:
Author Biographies
Muhammad Adil Amrullah Universitas Brawijay

Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Brawijaya, Kota Malang, Provinsi Jawa Timur, Indonesia.

Rachmat Kriyantono Universitas Brawijaya

Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Brawijaya, Kota Malang, Provinsi Jawa Timur, Indonesia.

Yuyun Agus Riani Universitas Brawijaya

Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Brawijaya, Kota Malang, Provinsi Jawa Timur, Indonesia.

How to Cite
Amrullah, M. A., Kriyantono, R., & Riani, Y. A. (2024). Komunikasi Interpersonal Dosen dan Mahasiswa Perguruan Tinggi Vokasi di Jurusan Teknik Mesin Politeknik Negeri Malang. Jurnal Indonesia : Manajemen Informatika Dan Komunikasi, 5(3), 2496-2509. https://doi.org/10.35870/jimik.v5i3.956
License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

  • Share: You are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
  • Adapt: You are free to remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
  • Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Copyright & Retention: Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant this journal the right of first publication under an open-access model. The journal retains non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.

References
Total: 26 References
  1. Asri, A. N. (2015, May). The Challenges of E-Learning in Higher Education. In PROGRAM BOOK.
  2. Billett, S. (2009). Vocational learning: Contributions of workplaces and educational institutions. In International handbook of education for the changing world of work: Bridging academic and vocational learning (pp. 1711-1723). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  3. Campero-Oliart, A. R., Lovelace, C. T., & Levitan, L. C. (2020). Contexts of communication apprehension and their relation to self-esteem. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 25(1), 42-53.
  4. Cardon, P., Okoro, E. A., Priest, R., & Patton, G. (2023). Communication apprehension in the workplace: Focusing on inclusion. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 86(1), 52-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906221129599.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Desain penelitian: Pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Jakarta: KIK-UI Press, translation.
  6. Damri, R. (2024). Penerimaan Diri Sebagai Prediktor Fear of Negative Evaluation Pada Emerging Adulthood di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah, 24(1), 79-88.
  7. DeVito, J. A. (2012). The interpersonal communication book 13th edition. Pearson.
  8. Dewi, S. L., Dewi, D. A., & Furnamasari, Y. F. (2021). Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran Interaktif pada Mata Pelajaran PKn di Kelas Rendah. Aulad: Journal on Early Childhood, 4(3), 12-19.
  9. Elva Ronaning Roem, S. (2019). Komunikasi Interpersonal. ER Sarmiati, Komunikasi Interpersonal. Malang: CV IRDH.
  10. Fitriyana, N., Karmiyati, D., Yuniardi, M. S., & Widiantoro, D. (2020). Hubungan antara self-efficacy dengan kecemasan komunikasi interpersonal pada mahasiswa baru. Personifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Psikologi, 11(1), 109-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/personifikasi.v11i1.7294.
  11. Gaspersz, A. P. (2022). Konsep diri dan kecemasan komunikasi interpersonal pada mahasiswa. INNER: Journal of Psychological Research, 2(1), 67-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.505.
  12. Hiniker, L., & Putnam, R. A. (2009). Partnering to meet the needs of a changing workplace. In International handbook of education for the changing world of work: Bridging academic and vocational learning (pp. 203-217). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  13. Jacobi, L. (2020). Seeking to understand the impact of collaboration on intercultural communication apprehension. Journal of International Students, 10(4), 892-911.
  14. Kriyantono, R., & Rakhmat, S. J. (2006). Metode penelitian komunikasi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  15. Miftah, M. (2008). Strategi komunikasi efektif dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Teknodik, 084-094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v12i2.473.
  16. Muliarta, I. K. (2018). Menerjemahkan Perubahan Dari TCL (Teacher Center Learning) Ke SCL (Student Center Learning). Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(2), 76-86.
  17. Mutawakkil, M., & Nuraedah, N. (2019). Gaya komunikasi dosen dalam pembelajaran mahasiswa. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu komunikasi, 3(2), 135-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/cjik.v3i2.5765.
  18. Novia, A. P., & Mahyuddin, N. (2020). Pembelajaran Sentra dalam Mengembangkan Kecerdasan Interpersonal Anak. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 4(2), 1247-1255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v4i2.591.
  19. Nurdin, A. (2020). Teori Komunikasi Interpersonal Disertai Contoh Fenomena Praktis. Prenada Media.
  20. Nurhasanah, N., Ramadhani, J., Utami, N. T., & Hasanah, U. (2024). Pentingnya Komunikasi Interpersonal Guru dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Belajar Siswa. VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas, 4(1), 201-207.
  21. Nurrachmah, S. (2024). Analisis Strategi Komunikasi Dalam Membangun Hubungan Interpersonal Yang Efektif. Jurnal Inovasi Global, 2(2), 265-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58344/jig.v2i2.60.
  22. Rahmadani, R., & Taufina, T. (2020). Pengembangan multimedia interaktif berbasis model problem based learning (pbl) bagi siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal basicedu, 4(4), 938-946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.465.
  23. Singh, N. (2011). Student-centered learning (SCL) in classrooms—A comprehensive overview. Educational Quest-An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences, 2(2), 275-282.
  24. Solikhah, R. N., Mufidah, W., & Nursanti, E. (2021). Komunikasi Interpersonal Dengan Job Search Behavior. IDEA: Jurnal Psikologi, 5(1), 16-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32492/idea.v5i1.5102.
  25. Warsah, I., Carles, E., Morganna, R., Anggraini, S., Silvana, S., & Maisaroh, S. (2023). Usaha Guru Mengurangi Kecemasan Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Pai. AT-TA'DIB: JURNAL ILMIAH PRODI PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM, 31-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47498/tadib.v15i1.1763.
  26. Xie, F., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). A conceptual review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 708490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490.