jimik@stmiki.ac.id 081377790601 Online Submission Open
Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025) • Articles
Open Access

Developing AI Regulations in Indonesia: Policy Recommendations Based on Comparative Policy Analysis from the European Union, the United States, and Singapore

Prabu Revolusi
Universitas Paramadina
Radians Krisna Febriandy
Universitas Paramadina
Published: May 10, 2025 Pages: 1035-1049
Original Full-Text Article
Download published version for reading and archiving
Download PDF
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly becoming the main driver of digital transformation in various sectors such as education, health, and finance. However, this development raises regulatory challenges, particularly regarding privacy protection, algorithm transparency, and AI usage ethics. Indonesia, with a high level of technology adoption but without a specific legal framework, faces the risk of misuse of this technology. This study uses a literature review and a comparative policy analysis approach to examine AI regulations in the European Union, the United States, and Singapore. The results of the analysis show that the European Union emphasizes data protection and strict supervision, the United States promotes flexibility for innovation, while Singapore offers a balance between social responsibility and technological progress. Based on these findings, this article recommends developing an AI regulatory framework in Indonesia by combining the principles of a risk-based approach, transparency, and algorithmic auditing, as well as the establishment of an independent AI regulatory agency. This regulation is expected to encourage innovation that is safe, ethical, and adaptive to technological dynamics.

Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) AI Regulation Policy Recommendations Data Privacy Algorithm Transparency
Article Metrics & Downloads Graph
Monthly Download Trends:
Author Biographies
Prabu Revolusi Universitas Paramadina

Political Communication, Faculty of Philosophy and Civilization, Universitas Paramadina, Cipayung, East Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia.

Radians Krisna Febriandy Universitas Paramadina

Political Communication, Faculty of Philosophy and Civilization, Universitas Paramadina, Cipayung, East Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia.

How to Cite
Revolusi, P., & Febriandy, R. K. (2025). Developing AI Regulations in Indonesia: Policy Recommendations Based on Comparative Policy Analysis from the European Union, the United States, and Singapore. Jurnal Indonesia : Manajemen Informatika Dan Komunikasi, 6(2), 1035-1049. https://doi.org/10.63447/jimik.v6i2.1380
License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

  • Share: You are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
  • Adapt: You are free to remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
  • Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Copyright & Retention: Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant this journal the right of first publication under an open-access model. The journal retains non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.

References
Total: 33 References
  1. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2019). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  2. Buhmann, A., Paßmann, J., & Fieseler, C. (2020). Managing algorithmic accountability: Balancing reputational concerns, engagement strategies, and the potential of rational discourse. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04226-4.
  3. Caplan, R. (2018). Algorithmic accountability: A primer. Data & Society, 501.
  4. Celsi, L. R. (2023). The dilemma of rapid AI advancements: Striking a balance between innovation and regulation by pursuing risk-aware value creation. Information, 14(12), 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/INFO14120645.
  5. Commission, E. (2021). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. In Brussels (Vol. 0106). https://doi.org/10.3139/9781569902356.023.
  1. Crawford, K., & Calo, R. (2016). There is a blind spot in AI research. Nature, 538(7625), 311–313. https://doi.org/10.1038/538311a.
  2. Erdélyi, O. J., & Goldsmith, J. (2022). Regulating artificial intelligence: Proposal for a global solution. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2022.101748.
  3. Falco, G., Shneiderman, B., Badger, J., Carrier, R., Dahbura, A., Danks, D., Eling, M., Goodloe, A.,
  4. Gupta, J., Hart, C., Jirotka, M., Johnson, H., LaPointe, C., Llorens, A. J., Mackworth, A. K., Maple, C., Pálsson, S. E., Pasquale, F., Winfield, A., & Yeong, Z. K. (2021). Governing AI safety through independent audits. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(7), 566–571. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00370-7.
  5. Frana, P. L. (2024). Assessing Smart Nation Singapore as an international model for AI responsibility. International Journal on Responsibility, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.62365/2576-0955.1109.
  6. Goodman, B., & Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation”. AI magazine, 38(3), 50-57.
  7. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  8. Horneber, D., & Laumer, S. (2023). Algorithmic accountability. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 65(6), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12599-023-00817-8/TABLES/1.
  9. Jannah, L. M., & Si, M. (2022). UU Perlindungan Data Pribadi dan Tantangan Implementasinya. Retrieved August, 16, 2023.
  10. Meiliana, A., Dewi, N. M., & Wijaya, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Indonesian Biomedical Journal, 11(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.18585/inabj.v11i2.844.
  11. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data and Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679.
  12. Mokander, J., Juneja, P., Watson, D., & Floridi, L. (2024). The US Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2022 vs. The EU Artificial Intelligence Act: What can they learn from each other? Minds and Machines, 32(4), 751–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-022-09612-y.
  13. Oladele, I., Orelaja, A., & Akinwande, O. T. (2024). Ethical implications and governance of artificial intelligence in business decisions: A deep dive into the ethical challenges and governance issues surrounding the use of artificial intelligence in making critical business decisions. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, XIII(II), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.51583/ijltemas.2024.130207.
  14. Oyewole, A. T., Adeoye, O. B., Addy, W. A., Okoye, C. C., Ofodile, O. C., & Ugochukwu, C. E. (2024). Automating financial reporting with natural language processing: A review and case analysis. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(3), 575-589. https://doi.org/10.51594/FARJ.V6I4.1035.
  15. Selbst, A. D. (2021). An institutional view of algorithmic impact assessments. Harv. JL & Tech., 35, 117.
  16. Silverman, D. (2020). Qualitative research. SAGE Publications Inc.
  17. Soelistiono, S. (2023). Educational technology innovation: Ai-integrated learning system design in ails-based education. Influence: International Journal of Science Review, 5(2), 470-480. https://doi.org/10.54783/influencejournal.v5i2.175.
  18. Taeihagh, A. (2021). Governance of artificial intelligence. Policy and Society, 40(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1928377.
  19. Tallberg, J., Erman, E., Furendal, M., Geith, J., Klamberg, M., & Lundgren, M. (2023). The global governance of artificial intelligence: Next steps for empirical and normative research. International Studies Review, 25(3), 40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ISR/VIAD040.
  20. Tallberg, J., Lundgren, M., & Geith, J. (2024). AI regulation in the European Union: Examining non-state actor preferences. Business and Politics, 26(2), 218–239. https://doi.org/10.1017/BAP.2023.36.
  21. Tillu, R., Muthusubramanian, M., & Periyasamy, V. (2023). From data to compliance: The role of AI/ML in optimizing regulatory reporting processes. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology, 2(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.60087/JKLST.VOL2.N3.P391.
  22. Tomašev, N., Cornebise, J., Hutter, F., Mohamed, S., Picciariello, A., Connelly, B., Belgrave, D. C. M., Ezer, D., Haert, F. C. van der, Mugisha, F., Abila, G., Arai, H., Almiraat, H., Proskurnia, J., Snyder, K., Otake-Matsuura, M., Othman, M., Glasmachers, T., Wever, W. de, … Clopath, C. (2020). AI for social good: Unlocking the opportunity for positive impact. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15871-z.
  23. Topol, E. (2019). Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again (Vol. 16, Issue 1). Basic Books.
  24. Ulnicane, I. (2022). Artificial intelligence in the European Union: Policy, ethics and regulation. In The Routledge Handbook of European Integrations (pp. 254–269). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429262081-19.
  25. Voigt, P., & Bussche, A. von dem. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A practical guide. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v13i2.37425.
  26. Wu, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence-enhanced learning: A new paradigm in the “business data analysis and application” course. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(2), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v8i2.6081.
  27. Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Publications.
  28. Zhang, W., Sanmugam, S., Allen, J. G., Wong, W., & Xu, O. (2023). Auditing AI for whom? A community-centric approach to rebuilding public trust in Singapore. SMU Centre for AI & Data Governance Research Paper, 185–200.
Similar Articles

Articles sharing related keywords and machine learning classifications:

Analisa Sentimen Pada Media Sosial “X” Pencarian Keyword ChatGPT Menggunakan Algoritma K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)
Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024) • DOI: 10.35870/jimik.v5i3.1016
Dampak Pengaruh Artificial Intelligence terhadap Orisinalitas Karya Ilustrator Menggunakan Support Vector Machine
Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025) • DOI: 10.63447/jimik.v6i3.1610
Optimalisasi Peran Telekomunikasi dalam Mendorong Inovasi Pelayanan Publik di Era Digital: A Systematic Literature Review
Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025) • DOI: 10.63447/jimik.v6i3.1632
Etika Regulasi dan Kebijakan Media Digital: Meningkatkan Kesadaran Publik di Era Informasi
Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025) • DOI: 10.63447/jimik.v6i3.1565
Strategi Komunikasi Mahasiswa dalam Menghadapi Hoaks dan Misinformasi di TikTok pada Mahasiswa Semester V–VIII Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan
Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026) • DOI: 10.63447/jimik.v7i3.2055