Perbandingan Kinerja Sistem Operasi Network Attached Storage: Studi Kasus Truenas dan Xigmanas
Original Full-Text Article
Download published version for reading and archivingAbstract
Network Attached Storage (NAS) is a data storage device that operates through a computer network and provides an efficient and cost-effective storage solution due to its open-source foundation. This research compares the performance of TrueNAS and XigmaNAS as NAS operating systems in terms of data transfer speed and resource utilization over a period of 7 days. The tested parameters include file copy, file classification, file duplicate detection, CPU usage, and memory usage. The research results indicate that the average file transfer speed from server to client in TrueNAS is 7.4 Mbps, while in XigmaNAS it is 7.36 Mbps. The average file classification rate in TrueNAS is 863 files/s, whereas in XigmaNAS it is 813 files/s. The average speed of duplicate file detection in TrueNAS is 1.23 files/s, while in XigmaNAS it is 1.13 files/s. The average CPU usage in TrueNAS is 30.08%, compared to 29.38% in XigmaNAS. The average available memory for TrueNAS is 6.13 GiB, and for XigmaNAS it is 5.41 GiB. Despite the small variations and differences observed in the test results, overall, TrueNAS outperforms XigmaNAS in the analyzed aspects.
Keywords:
Author Biographies
Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Sains Teknologi, Universitas Bina Darma, Kota Palembang, Provinsi Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia
Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Sains Teknologi, Universitas Bina Darma, Kota Palembang, Provinsi Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia
Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Sains Teknologi, Universitas Bina Darma, Kota Palembang, Provinsi Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia
Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Sains Teknologi, Universitas Bina Darma, Kota Palembang, Provinsi Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia
How to Cite
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .
- Share: You are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
- Adapt: You are free to remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
References
Total: 5 References- Kurniawan, A., Hendrawan, A. H., & Prakosa, B. A. (2018, July). Analisis perbandingan kinerja freeNAS, NAS4Free dan open media vault (OMV) sebagai sistem operasi network attached storage (NAS). In Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi (Vol. 1, pp. 74-83).
- Sasongko, H., & Hadiwandra, T. Y. (2020). Analisis NAS (Network Attached Storage) Berbasis Cloud Sebagai Layanan Infrasturcture As A Service (IAAS) Menggunakan Open Source Nas4free Dan Owncloud. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Teknik dan Sains, 7, 1-12.
- Santoso, K. I., & Muin, M. A. (2015). Implementasi Network Attached Storage (NAS) Menggunakan NAS4Free untuk Media Backup File. Scientific Journal of Informatics, 2(2), 123-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v2i2.5078.
- Gambarotto, P., & Aubry, P. (2004). Esup-portail: A pure webdav-based network attached storage. Actes of EUNIS.
- Jusak, J. S. S., Akbar, T. S. S., & Sutanto, T. S. S. (2014). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Freenas Dan NAS4Free Sebagai Sistem Operasi Jaringan Network Attached Storage (NAS) Pada Local Area Network (LAN). Jurnal JSIKA, 3(1).
Similar Articles
Articles sharing related keywords and machine learning classifications: