Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025) Articles
Open Access

Perbandingan Algoritma Decision Tree, ID3, dan Random Forest dalam Klasifikasi Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Karier Mahasiswa Ilmu Komputer

Dedy Hartama
STIKOM Tunas Bangsa
Nanda Amalya
STIKOM Tunas Bangsa
Published: January 10, 2025 Pages: 72-80
Original Full-Text Article
Download published version for reading and archiving
Abstract

This study aims to compare the performance of three classification algorithms, namely Decision Tree, ID3, and Random Forest, in identifying factors that influence the careers of computer Science students. These algorithms are applied to a dataset that includes various student attributes, such as GPA, programming skills, and completed projects. The results show that Random Forest provides more accurate and stable prediction results than Decision Tree and ID3, especially in reducing the risk of overfitting. Students with high skills in Python and SQL and who focus on software development tend to choose a career in Software Engineering. While those involved in AI/ML-based projects tend to choose Data Science. The conclusions of this study provide valuable insights for educational institutions to design more effective career development strategies for students.

Article Metrics & Downloads Graph
Monthly Download Trends:
Author Biographies
Dedy Hartama STIKOM Tunas Bangsa

Program Studi Teknik Informatika, STIKOM Tunas Bangsa, Kota Pematangsiantar, Provinsi Sumatra Utara, Indonesia.

Nanda Amalya STIKOM Tunas Bangsa

Program Studi Teknik Informatika, STIKOM Tunas Bangsa, Kota Pematangsiantar, Provinsi Sumatra Utara, Indonesia.

How to Cite
Hartama, D., & Amalya, N. (2025). Perbandingan Algoritma Decision Tree, ID3, dan Random Forest dalam Klasifikasi Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Karier Mahasiswa Ilmu Komputer. Jurnal Indonesia : Manajemen Informatika Dan Komunikasi, 6(1), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.35870/jimik.v6i1.1113
License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

  • Share: You are free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
  • Adapt: You are free to remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
  • Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Copyright & Retention: Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant this journal the right of first publication under an open-access model. The journal retains non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.

References
Total: 15 References
  1. Agarwal, S., Pandey, G. N., & Tiwari, M. D. (2012). Data mining in education: data classification and decision tree approach. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 2(2), 140.
  2. Ali, J., Khan, R., Ahmad, N., & Maqsood, I. (2012). Random forests and decision trees. International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI), 9(5), 272.
  3. Azam, Z., Islam, M. M., & Huda, M. N. (2023). Comparative analysis of intrusion detection systems and machine learning based model analysis through decision tree. IEEE Access.
  4. Chaudhuri, A. K., Ray, A., Banerjee, D. K., & Das, A. (2021). A multi-stage approach combining feature selection with machine learning techniques for higher prediction reliability and accuracy in cervical cancer diagnosis. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 10(5), 46.
  5. Gupta, U. G., & Houtz, L. E. (2000). High school students’ perceptions of information technology skills and careers. Journal of Industrial Technology, 16(4), 2-8.
  1. Jha, K., Likhitha, D., Chandana, M. S., Reddy, M. R. P., & Bhargavi, M. (2024, July). Career Prediction Using Machine Learning. In 2024 8th International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC) (pp. 118-122). IEEE.
  2. Kotsiantis, S. B., Zaharakis, I., & Pintelas, P. (2007). Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques. Emerging artificial intelligence applications in computer engineering, 160(1), 3-24.
  3. Lewis, C. P. (2004). The relation between extracurricular activities with academic and social competencies in school-age children: A meta-analysis. Texas A&M University.
  4. Liaw, A., & Wiener, M. (2002). Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2 (3): 18–22.
  5. Mikhalkina, E. V., Skachkova, L. S., & Gerasimova, O. Y. (2019). Academic or non-academic career: What choice do graduates of federal universities make. Terra Economicus, 17(4), 148-173.
  6. Pranckevičius, T., & Marcinkevičius, V. (2017). Comparison of naive bayes, random forest, decision tree, support vector machines, and logistic regression classifiers for text reviews classification. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 5(2), 221.
  7. Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine learning, 1, 81-106.
  8. Schonlau, M., & Zou, R. Y. (2020). The random forest algorithm for statistical learning. The Stata Journal, 20(1), 3-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X20909688.
  9. VidyaShreeram, N., & Muthukumaravel, A. (2021, June). Student career prediction using machine learning approaches. In First International Conference on Computing, Communication and Control System (p. 444).
  10. Yang, Z., Yang, J., Rice, K., Hung, J. L., & Du, X. (2020). Using convolutional neural network to recognize learning images for early warning of at-risk students. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(3), 617-630.